Daily Michael
  • Home
  • News
    • Estate Statements
  • Lawsuits
    • Robson-Safechuck-Doe
    • Estate v. IRS
    • Cascio Lawsuit
    • Q.Jones v. Estate
    • Estate v. Tohme
    • 3T v. Radar Online
    • Last Photo Shoots
    • King of Pop Lawsuit
    • MJ Company Lawsuit
  • Past Lawsuits
    • People v. Murray
    • Jackson v. AEG
    • Estate v. HTWF
    • Bain v. Estate
    • Lloyds v. Estate
    • Estate v. Mann
    • Hologram Lawsuit
    • Chicago Lawsuit
    • Other
  • The Estate
  • Reviews
  • Opinions

Exclusive: Selling Neverland was the goal of Colony Capital and MJ all along

Details
ivy
Estate v. Tohme
14 February 2015
Hits: 14891
fShare
Tweet

Neverland Ranch related issues have been on the fans radar for several years. First there was the foreclosure news, followed by MJ – Colony Capital refinancing deal. After Michael’s death, fans wondered what would happen to Neverland. Last year we heard that Colony Capital decided to sell Neverland. This brought a lot more questions. Based on the available information, we believed there was a joint venture between MJ and Colony Capital. Fans questioned how Colony Capital can decide to sell Neverland and how could Estate have no right to stop the sale.

Until today we couldn’t answer such questions. However recently Tohme’s Finder’s Fee Claim (10% from Neverland refinancing, 10% from any future transaction about Neverland) has been put on calendar and this resulted in Tohme filing some documents which included letters and agreements between MJ and Colony Capital. For the first time we get a look inside the Neverland deal between Colony Capital and MJ.

First we confirm that there was a joint venture between MJ and Colony Capital. However the documents also state that the goal of the joint venture between MJ and Colony Capital was “to own, operate, reposition and sell Neverland”.

Read more ...

Overview of Court of Appeals Ruling for Jackson v. AEG Appeal

Details
Admin
Jackson v. AEG
30 January 2015
Hits: 7397
fShare
Tweet

Only a week after the oral arguments Court of Appeals have denied Katherine Jackson’s request for a new trial against AEG and affirmed jury’s decision. Court of Appeals released a 39 page ruling and certified the ruling for publication making it citable by other parties and courts.

Assuming not everyone will have time or interest to read the full ruling, I decided to copy sections from the ruling to make it easier to understand why the Court of Appeals decided the way they did.

Court of Appeal’s 39 page ruling can be found at this link: http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B252411.PDF

 

Negligence claim

Jacksons argued the trial court made a mistake in dismissing the negligence claim. Below is Court of Appeal’s explanation why the trial court’s decision was correct.

Read more ...

Biased media reporting in Robson v. MJ Estate case

Details
ivy
Robson v. Estate
06 November 2014
Hits: 10356
fShare
Tweet

{socialbuttons}

Recently you might have seen two Radar Online articles reporting the recent developments in Robson v. MJ Estate case. You might also have realized the extremely biased headlines and questionable choice of words in those articles. This post is going to cover the recent developments as well as the biased reporting about those developments.

Do you wonder what is going on in Robson v. MJ Estate civil case? They are having a dispute about interrogatories and request for admissions (RFAs).  California Civil Code of procedure says a party can serve 35 interrogatories and 35 RFAs. Robson has served 143 interrogatories and 93 RFAs. If you do the math that’s more than 4 times the allowed interrogatories and more than 2.5 times the allowed RFAs. Estate wants to answer 35 interrogatories and 35 RFAs – as the law requires them to do. Robson lawyers on the other hand want them to answer it all. There have been discussions among the parties and they have agreed that Estate will answer 35+8 (43) interrogatories instead of the original 143 sent. However they cannot agree about RFAs. Robson lawyers want all 93 where as Estate lawyers want it to limit it to the first 35 RFAs. In order to send more than 35 RFAs, lawyers need to justify the need for the extra items. Estate argues Robson side wasn’t able to justify why they sent so many questions while Robson lawyers disagree with that. Motions have been filed about it, a hearing is set for November 6th and the judge will rule about this dispute sometime soon.

Read more ...

Robson v. Estate September 2014 Case Updates

Details
ivy
Robson v. Estate
28 September 2014
Hits: 6808
fShare
Tweet

{socialbuttons}

UPDATE: October 1 2014 Hearing Transcript : https://www.scribd.com/doc/244181549/Robson-Oct-1-2014-Hearing-Transcript

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link to previous July 2014 case updates: http://www.dailymichael.com/lawsuits/robson-v-estate/276-robson-v-estate-case-updates

Civil case updates

Estate had filed two demurrers (dismissal request stating there’s no legal basis for a lawsuit) and parties are getting ready for the demurrer hearing. Most current documents (added September 24th) are Estate’s replies to Robson’s opposition to Estate’s demurrer requests. As I prepare this post court system isn’t showing Robson’s opposition documents (I’ll update this post if they become available) therefore this post is done based on what the Estate reply documents state about Robson’s opposition and their reply.

Hearing for these two demurrers is set for October 1st.

Doe1 (MJ) Demurrer

Document link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/241210020/Robson-Estate-Reply-Doe-1-Demurrer

Estate had filed a demurrer to dismiss MJ as Doe 1 defendant on the civil case simply arguing Doe1 / MJ is deceased and no court has jurisdiction to have a case or have power to enter judgment against him.

Read more ...

More Articles ...

  1. MJ Estate v. Tohme lawsuit updates
  2. MJ Estate ask Judge to throw out claims by Safechuck
  3. A PLACE WITH NO NAME - Maxi CD Single is released on Michael Jackson.com
  4. A Place With No Name Video Premiere
  5. Colony Capital is selling Neverland
Page 15 of 23
  • Start
  • Prev
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • Next
  • End

Latest Articles

  • Robson case dismissed for good, Judge’s ruling explained
  • Summary Judgment Time at Robson Case
  • Wade Robson's Lawyers Harass Jonathan Spence
  • Specifics of the verdict at Quincy Jones v. MJ Estate trial
  • Joy Robson and Others Expose Wade’s Lies - The Summary Judgment Exhibits

Welcome

Welcome to Daily Michael - a fan site dedicated to Michael Jackson. Don't forget to follow us at twitter and facebook.

 

Ivy Twitter

Daily Michael Twitter

Daily Michael Facebook

About us: Daily Michael is a Michael Jackson fan site. It is established in 2014. 

Contact us : admin@dailymichael.com

Copyright ©2010-2016 Daily Michael

Bootstrap is a front-end framework of Twitter, Inc. Code licensed under MIT License. Font Awesome font licensed under SIL OFL 1.1.